{"id":572,"date":"2019-10-04T17:28:34","date_gmt":"2019-10-04T11:58:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/softcrony.com\/blog\/?p=572"},"modified":"2019-10-04T17:28:34","modified_gmt":"2019-10-04T11:58:34","slug":"predictive-and-adaptive-development-comparison","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/softcrony.com\/blog\/predictive-and-adaptive-development-comparison\/","title":{"rendered":"Predictive and Adaptive Development Comparison"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>What\u2019s the difference?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">When it comes to\nsoftware development, choosing the best software model is just as important as\nchoosing the best vendor. Why is the model so important? A wise man once said\nthat if you fail to plan, you plan to fail, and the Systems Development Life\nCycle (SDLC) model is an important component in planning a project. The SLDC is\na conceptual framework that describes all the actions in software development \u2014\nin other words, it\u2019s the key planning tool that will guide your developers step\nby step throughout the project. You require a model that can keep all the\nbusiness requirements, assure every feature is designed and built accurately,\nand ensure the project works as it should.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The various SDLC\nmodels fall into two primary groups: predictive and adaptive. Both methods are\nequally valid, and it\u2019s the project type that should drive the model selection.\nThe choice will depend on the evaluation of all the pros and cons of each model\nin the context of the particular project\u2019s goals and limitations.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Predictive Development<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Predictive, or\nIncremental, development is a process of software development where the model\nis designed, implemented, and tested incrementally until the product is\ncompleted \u2014 or until all the requirements have been satisfied. This model\nconnects the elements of the waterfall model with the iterative conception of\nprototyping. In this model, each module passes through the requirements,\ndesign, implementation, and testing stages.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As this model involves\ndelivering system components as they\u2019re completed, it allows for partial\nutilization of product meaning completed features can be used before the full\nproject is finished \u2014 and avoids a long development time. That means this model\nhelps reduce the traumatic effect of adding a completely new system all at\nonce.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Pros:&nbsp;<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>The predictive model makes a working software product faster than the adaptive model.&nbsp;<\/li><li>It\u2019s more comfortable to manage uncertainty with this model because possible obstacles are identified and handled during their      first iterations.&nbsp;<\/li><li>It is easier to test and debug during iterations of smaller pieces than on the full product.&nbsp;<\/li><li>This model allows for more flexibility, as changes to scope and requirements may be made to every increment.&nbsp;<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Cons:&nbsp;<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>This model needs good planning and design. If tasks aren&#8217;t done correctly in each phase, the complete project can be impacted.&nbsp;<\/li><li>A clear and complete description of the whole system is needed before it can be broken down and developed incrementally.&nbsp;<\/li><li>Additional efforts are required to integrate each component of the system.&nbsp;<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">When to use the\npredictive model:&nbsp;<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>When the requirements are clear and can be completed in logical phases, even though some details may evolve with time.&nbsp;<\/li><li>When there are some high-risk features and goals or when the product requests for new technology.&nbsp;<\/li><li>When the customer needs clarity on and strict adherence to the target delivery\/end date based on the agreed-upon scope.&nbsp;<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Adaptive Development<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Adaptive life cycles\nlike SCRUM or Kanban (also known as agile or change-driven) are designed to\nrepeat quickly on projects that are a little more innovative or less certain.\nThey\u2019re dependent on ongoing stakeholder contributions, and they react quickly\nto the changes in project scope and system demands. This procedure is sometimes\nreferred to as freeform software design as it offers an incredibly flexible\ndesign model, promoting adaptive planning and evolutionary development when the\nend goal is not quite as concrete.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Short sprints with\nmany product demo sessions allow flexibility and prompt adjustments to a\nproduct increment, decreasing the risk of wasted costs, even when we\u2019re moving\nfast. Daily scrum meetings are intended to track growth and proactively react\nto changing conditions. Product owners are closely involved in the development\nprocess, eventually becoming a part of a team to allow real collaboration\nbetween our developers and our clients.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Pros:&nbsp;<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>This model permits evolving requirements so change can be implemented very smoothly given the shorter planning cycles.<\/li><li>This model promotes customer satisfaction through fast and continuous delivery.&nbsp;<\/li><li>Adaptive development promotes active involvement and      interaction from key project stakeholders, which allows for product build based on priority and accuracy.&nbsp;<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Cons:&nbsp;<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>Planning can be questionable.&nbsp;<\/li><li>Team members must be highly skilled and cross-skilled as core teams are small.&nbsp;<\/li><li>The project can simply get thrown off track if the customer is not clear on the desired outcome.&nbsp;<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">When to use the\nadaptive model:&nbsp;<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>When the end goals of projects are not clearly explained.&nbsp;<\/li><li>When the implementation process must start faster.<\/li><li>When the project calls for experimental software design.&nbsp;<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">When it comes down to\nit, neither the predictive nor adaptive model is significantly better than the\nother. Both methods have their uses, and there is not a right or wrong\nselection. Incremental development tends to be best for static projects where\nthe conditions aren\u2019t likely to change throughout the development process. In\ncontrast, adaptive models tend to be a better option for projects in which\nchanges are likely.&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What\u2019s the difference? When it comes to software development, choosing the best software model is just as important as choosing the best vendor. Why is the model so important? A wise man once said that if you fail to plan, you plan to fail, and the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) model is an important [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":934,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,32,17],"tags":[172,173,162],"class_list":["post-572","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-apps-n-software","category-mobile","category-technology","tag-adaptive","tag-predictive","tag-software-development"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/softcrony.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/572","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/softcrony.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/softcrony.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/softcrony.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/softcrony.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=572"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/softcrony.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/572\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/softcrony.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/934"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/softcrony.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=572"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/softcrony.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=572"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/softcrony.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=572"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}